It was a friend's birthday the other day. So we had cake. I love cake!
The best cake in Chinatown is from a place on Stockton Street. It is crowded and busy and people bustle in and out. They have a very wide selection of mooncakes, and they are also well-regarded for their egg tarts and little custard pies. But they are best at cake.
永興餅家茶餐廳
The AA Bakery and Cafe
1068 Stockton St. San Francisco, CA 94108
415-981-0123
That's pronounced 'wing hing beng kaa cha tsan-teeeeeeng!'
It means 'Eternal Prosperity Bakery and Tea-Cafeteria'.
It's fun sitting there and snarfing down something sweet with a big cup of milk-tea while watching aunties pushing and shoving at the counter, and the tourist people coming in, looking lost and baffled for a few moments, before sort of drifting out in a daze.
Folks, it's all affordable. So what if you don't know what it is. How hard is it to figure out that curry roll is savory, egg tart is sweet, and anything that looks like a cookie probably IS a cookie?
Yeah, a pineapple bun looks strange. Try it. Fifty cents really gonna break the bank?
But their cakes are superb! Best fruit chunks, angle food layers, and cream filling combinations in all of Chinatown. And they are artists, doing very beautiful icing sculpture too.
It isn't a real birthday celebration unless there's a cake from AA.
So how old IS he? About fifty five? Sixty?
He still LOOKS vibrant and vigorous - must be all that rich sweetened butter cream filling his joints. And the fruit. Fruit is healthy.
Thursday, October 15, 2009
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Most miserable protest ever!
What a monumental waste of time. International ANSWER and Richard Becker were holding a protest down at the new Federal Building at Mission and Seventh, and it stank.
Okay, maybe about one hundred to one hundred and fifty middle-aged Berkeley nimrods showed up. Plus one or two idiots wearing those checkered shemag-type rags.
The speeches were all across the board. Very pointless. Some abgry Latin housewife ranted about the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. They arrested her last week and fined her several thousand dollars for littering and postering. The nerve! Ay madre Maria!
The fact that you get fined for littering, if you litter, is, apparently, a sign of horrible depravity and imperialist suppport for dumping daisy-cutters on Afghan farmers and recruiting fourteen year olds in the American school system. Oakland is just as bad. They're all icky bastards.
Richard Becker spoke too. It was very uninspiring, very unfocussed. Several other people screamed strident things into the microphone. There was some insipid and anemic chanting at some point.
No, it wasn't about Israel. I don't really know what it was about. The whole excercise seemed remarkably pointless. Maybe Grant Patel is right; maybe Richard Becker has lost his manhood. I wonder who the she-gorgon is who emasculated him. If that's the best that the America-hating commies on the West-Coast can do, there is nothing to fear. The twenty cops who were there could snuff the revolution out before anyone even blinked.
Pathetic. Stupid. Pointless. Loopy. Very San Francisco. Cold and windy. Bah.
Richard Becker, go back to the drawing board. And get some medical help for your manhood. Maybe it's not the size that is deficient (sorry, Grant), maybe it's the complete lack of testicular impressiveness to begin with. You are old, scruntchy, and sallow. Your teeth look rotten, and those glasses look rather goobus. You are a most unimpressive man. Richard Becker, you are a shallow and very silly weasel.
Okay, maybe about one hundred to one hundred and fifty middle-aged Berkeley nimrods showed up. Plus one or two idiots wearing those checkered shemag-type rags.
The speeches were all across the board. Very pointless. Some abgry Latin housewife ranted about the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. They arrested her last week and fined her several thousand dollars for littering and postering. The nerve! Ay madre Maria!
The fact that you get fined for littering, if you litter, is, apparently, a sign of horrible depravity and imperialist suppport for dumping daisy-cutters on Afghan farmers and recruiting fourteen year olds in the American school system. Oakland is just as bad. They're all icky bastards.
Richard Becker spoke too. It was very uninspiring, very unfocussed. Several other people screamed strident things into the microphone. There was some insipid and anemic chanting at some point.
No, it wasn't about Israel. I don't really know what it was about. The whole excercise seemed remarkably pointless. Maybe Grant Patel is right; maybe Richard Becker has lost his manhood. I wonder who the she-gorgon is who emasculated him. If that's the best that the America-hating commies on the West-Coast can do, there is nothing to fear. The twenty cops who were there could snuff the revolution out before anyone even blinked.
Pathetic. Stupid. Pointless. Loopy. Very San Francisco. Cold and windy. Bah.
Richard Becker, go back to the drawing board. And get some medical help for your manhood. Maybe it's not the size that is deficient (sorry, Grant), maybe it's the complete lack of testicular impressiveness to begin with. You are old, scruntchy, and sallow. Your teeth look rotten, and those glasses look rather goobus. You are a most unimpressive man. Richard Becker, you are a shallow and very silly weasel.
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Admiring the artistic rapist
Two other bloggers have written about sex with a thirteen year old girl. My heavens, what is this world coming to? Shenanigans with a teenage girl! Exciting, lah!
Admittedly, neither one explores the erotic aspect of Roman Polanski's despoliation of the young lady in any way, but that they write of it at all indicates what a powerful influence the event had.
http://infectiousasian.blogspot.com/2009/09/whoopi-goldberg-is-nuts-nuts.html
Quote: "Whoopi Goldberg is barking mad. Yesterday she said that what Roman Polanski did in 1977 wasn't 'rape rape'."
http://atthebackofthehill.blogspot.com/2009/09/statutory-rape-not-just-those-crazy.html
Quote: "France has finally conceded, albeit grudgingly, that committing statutory rape on an American girl is a crime. Even if the girl is very American (wow, naked Hollywood teenager!), and even if the rapist is a respected European artist."
Genius, intellectual, pedophile, rapist, sodomite, and .... FRENCH!
In short: Roman Polanski (Roman Rajmund Polański; born August 18, 1933), a much-admired European import in Hollywood in the prime of his life (44 years old), gives alcohol and drugs to a young girl (13 years old), removes her clothing despite her protestations, and forces himself upon her. Then, worried that an accidental pregnancy might testify to his crime, he decides instead to finish his act in her anus. After he has slaked his lusts, he tells the girl "don't tell your mother - this is our secret".
"Don't tell your mother about this; this is our secret."
He was arrested after thirty two years hiding out among his intellectual kindred:
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/entertainment/a/-/entertainment/6105909/france-poland-want-polanski-bail/
Quote:
The arrest prompted angry criticism on Monday from fellow filmmakers and actors across Europe.
"It seems inadmissible ... that an international cultural evening, paying homage to one of the greatest contemporary filmmakers, is used by police to apprehend him," says a petition circulating in France and signed by artists including Costa Gavras, Stefen Frears and Monica Bellucci.
Oscar-winning director Andrzej Wajda and other Polish filmmakers also appealed for the immediate release of Polanski
End quote
Inadmissible? What strange planet are you from?
Quote:
In Paris, French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said he hoped Polanski could be quickly freed by the Swiss, calling the apprehension a "bit sinister."
Polanski was "thrown to the lions," said French Culture Minister Frederic Mitterrand. "In the same way that there is a generous America that we like, there is also a scary America that has just shown its face."
End quote
"I said, like, 'No, no. I don't want to go in there. No, I don't want to do this. No', and then I didn't know what else to do."
With all due respect for the many talented people who believe that cinematographic excellence puts one above the law, and for all the serious intellectuals and culture pundits, both in France and elsewhere, I cannot but think that this is a sick sick world.
Roman Polanski is an unreconstructed, unapologetic, and incontrite child molester who fails to understand the gravity and sheer nastiness of his crime, and the people who call for his release are sick depraved bastards whose fame has gone to their heads.
He is not above the law, no matter how stupendous and important his contribution to movies. None of his fans are above the law, and none of them should use their high positions as bully pulpits to insist that one of theirs who committed a horrible offense somehow deserves immunity.
They are disgusting, and their hero-worship of Roman Polanski proves them unwholesome and undeserving of respect.
It's a question of VALUES - Hollywood and the European intelligentsia do not have any.
They are moral midgets and ethical invalids.
Admittedly, neither one explores the erotic aspect of Roman Polanski's despoliation of the young lady in any way, but that they write of it at all indicates what a powerful influence the event had.
http://infectiousasian.blogspot.com/2009/09/whoopi-goldberg-is-nuts-nuts.html
Quote: "Whoopi Goldberg is barking mad. Yesterday she said that what Roman Polanski did in 1977 wasn't 'rape rape'."
http://atthebackofthehill.blogspot.com/2009/09/statutory-rape-not-just-those-crazy.html
Quote: "France has finally conceded, albeit grudgingly, that committing statutory rape on an American girl is a crime. Even if the girl is very American (wow, naked Hollywood teenager!), and even if the rapist is a respected European artist."
Genius, intellectual, pedophile, rapist, sodomite, and .... FRENCH!
In short: Roman Polanski (Roman Rajmund Polański; born August 18, 1933), a much-admired European import in Hollywood in the prime of his life (44 years old), gives alcohol and drugs to a young girl (13 years old), removes her clothing despite her protestations, and forces himself upon her. Then, worried that an accidental pregnancy might testify to his crime, he decides instead to finish his act in her anus. After he has slaked his lusts, he tells the girl "don't tell your mother - this is our secret".
"Don't tell your mother about this; this is our secret."
He was arrested after thirty two years hiding out among his intellectual kindred:
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/entertainment/a/-/entertainment/6105909/france-poland-want-polanski-bail/
Quote:
The arrest prompted angry criticism on Monday from fellow filmmakers and actors across Europe.
"It seems inadmissible ... that an international cultural evening, paying homage to one of the greatest contemporary filmmakers, is used by police to apprehend him," says a petition circulating in France and signed by artists including Costa Gavras, Stefen Frears and Monica Bellucci.
Oscar-winning director Andrzej Wajda and other Polish filmmakers also appealed for the immediate release of Polanski
End quote
Inadmissible? What strange planet are you from?
Quote:
In Paris, French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said he hoped Polanski could be quickly freed by the Swiss, calling the apprehension a "bit sinister."
Polanski was "thrown to the lions," said French Culture Minister Frederic Mitterrand. "In the same way that there is a generous America that we like, there is also a scary America that has just shown its face."
End quote
"I said, like, 'No, no. I don't want to go in there. No, I don't want to do this. No', and then I didn't know what else to do."
With all due respect for the many talented people who believe that cinematographic excellence puts one above the law, and for all the serious intellectuals and culture pundits, both in France and elsewhere, I cannot but think that this is a sick sick world.
Roman Polanski is an unreconstructed, unapologetic, and incontrite child molester who fails to understand the gravity and sheer nastiness of his crime, and the people who call for his release are sick depraved bastards whose fame has gone to their heads.
He is not above the law, no matter how stupendous and important his contribution to movies. None of his fans are above the law, and none of them should use their high positions as bully pulpits to insist that one of theirs who committed a horrible offense somehow deserves immunity.
They are disgusting, and their hero-worship of Roman Polanski proves them unwholesome and undeserving of respect.
It's a question of VALUES - Hollywood and the European intelligentsia do not have any.
They are moral midgets and ethical invalids.
Saturday, September 19, 2009
one BIG bag of candy
Soooo goood!
I shouldn't have eaten it all, of course. But really, I had to. You see, Walgreens now carries large bags of small candy bars. Which are perfect for Halloween. So I had to test the merchandise, to see if this is what we want to give the kiddies when they come to the door in another month and a half.
Rigorous testing beforehand, in case it isn't the right stuff.
Nothing but the best for the urchins. And take it from me, they love KITKAT.
This is gonna be a good year for kitkat. Mini kitkat. Nice and crispy underneath their veil of chocolate.
Just to be on the safe side, I should probably buy another bag.
I shouldn't have eaten it all, of course. But really, I had to. You see, Walgreens now carries large bags of small candy bars. Which are perfect for Halloween. So I had to test the merchandise, to see if this is what we want to give the kiddies when they come to the door in another month and a half.
Rigorous testing beforehand, in case it isn't the right stuff.
Nothing but the best for the urchins. And take it from me, they love KITKAT.
This is gonna be a good year for kitkat. Mini kitkat. Nice and crispy underneath their veil of chocolate.
Just to be on the safe side, I should probably buy another bag.
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Forty years of perfidy
It has been four decades since a Muslim eruption that has had a profound impact on the world of today.
But most people will be unaware of this fact. Because the group of Muslims involved has assiduously worked to obscure their actions, and the victims have with patient and civilized forbearance not stressed the issues.
Oh, the other reason naturally is that the Muslims in question are not Arabs, and the victims weren't Arabs either.
No whites or Arabs involved. So it doesn't matter.
Quote:
"Officially, 196 people were killed between May 13 and July 31 as a result of the riots, although journalists and other observers have stated much higher figures. Other reports at the time suggest over 2,000 were killed."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1969_Kuala_Lumpur,_Malaysia_Race_Riots
Muslim behavior in Malaysia towards the Chinese and Indian minorities who developed the tin mines, market gardens, rubber plantations, and industries that allow the Malays to pretend towards first-world culture and achievement has been fairly atrocious.
It's enshrined in law, and called the Bumiputera Policy.
What it is, is a system of apartheid towards non-Malays (meaning: non-Muslims) in favor of people claiming to be natives - many of whom moved into the country from Java, Sumatra, and elsewhere in the Muslim world during the British period.
The Malay Peninsula till the eighteen hundreds had been jungle, sparsely inhabited along the coast. Chinese immigrants were brought in to work in the mines. Tamils worked the rubber plantations.
Muslims came in over the next several decades for the opportunity to rob Chinese and Tamils.
During Word War Two the Chinese Malayans were killed in large numbers by the Japanese.
The Muslims, on the other hand, collaborated lock-stock-and-barrel with the occupiers, and profited enormously from doing so.
In return for which, the British unwisely gave them independence, leading to the Malayan emergency when masses of poor Chinese in the hinterlands realized that the English were screwing them over and pandering to the thieves.
In 1969 the Malays rioted against the Chinese in many cities, killing thousands. Whereupon the Malay government decided to further exclude Chinese from the table, and imposed racialist apartheid laws. The Muslims are considered "native", Chinese and Tamils (many of whose families have been there for centuries) are labeled 'immigrants', and are legally discriminated against. Occasionally Malays kill a person of Chinese ancestry for funsies, especially up near the Thai border.
Malaysia is the only country left where there is still apartheid. But it's Muslim bigotry, against non-whites to boot, so it doesn't really matter.
But most people will be unaware of this fact. Because the group of Muslims involved has assiduously worked to obscure their actions, and the victims have with patient and civilized forbearance not stressed the issues.
Oh, the other reason naturally is that the Muslims in question are not Arabs, and the victims weren't Arabs either.
No whites or Arabs involved. So it doesn't matter.
Quote:
"Officially, 196 people were killed between May 13 and July 31 as a result of the riots, although journalists and other observers have stated much higher figures. Other reports at the time suggest over 2,000 were killed."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1969_Kuala_Lumpur,_Malaysia_Race_Riots
Muslim behavior in Malaysia towards the Chinese and Indian minorities who developed the tin mines, market gardens, rubber plantations, and industries that allow the Malays to pretend towards first-world culture and achievement has been fairly atrocious.
It's enshrined in law, and called the Bumiputera Policy.
What it is, is a system of apartheid towards non-Malays (meaning: non-Muslims) in favor of people claiming to be natives - many of whom moved into the country from Java, Sumatra, and elsewhere in the Muslim world during the British period.
The Malay Peninsula till the eighteen hundreds had been jungle, sparsely inhabited along the coast. Chinese immigrants were brought in to work in the mines. Tamils worked the rubber plantations.
Muslims came in over the next several decades for the opportunity to rob Chinese and Tamils.
During Word War Two the Chinese Malayans were killed in large numbers by the Japanese.
The Muslims, on the other hand, collaborated lock-stock-and-barrel with the occupiers, and profited enormously from doing so.
In return for which, the British unwisely gave them independence, leading to the Malayan emergency when masses of poor Chinese in the hinterlands realized that the English were screwing them over and pandering to the thieves.
In 1969 the Malays rioted against the Chinese in many cities, killing thousands. Whereupon the Malay government decided to further exclude Chinese from the table, and imposed racialist apartheid laws. The Muslims are considered "native", Chinese and Tamils (many of whose families have been there for centuries) are labeled 'immigrants', and are legally discriminated against. Occasionally Malays kill a person of Chinese ancestry for funsies, especially up near the Thai border.
Malaysia is the only country left where there is still apartheid. But it's Muslim bigotry, against non-whites to boot, so it doesn't really matter.
Lolita
So one of the other bloggers is reading Vladimir Nabokov's book Lolita now. What's fascinating, to me, is that she is barely older than the title character in the book. Which I read over a year ago.
Infectious Asian (Stephanie 周) these posts: 1. Lolita: http://infectiousasian.blogspot.com/2009/09/lolita.html 2. Nabokov and Lolita - Nymphets in the bellfry: http://infectiousasian.blogspot.com/2009/09/nabokov-and-lolita-nymphets-in-bellfry.html 3. Charlotte Haze and her dishy daughter: http://infectiousasian.blogspot.com/2009/09/charlotte-haze-and-her-dishy-daughter.html 4. Oh no! Lolita has absconded! : http://infectiousasian.blogspot.com/2009/09/oh-no-lolita-has-absconded.html
I cannot say that the characters in the book are very attractive. Lolita is described in a way that makes clear that her delightful physique (if you are inclined towards pedophilia) is not matched by any intellectual appeal. She is shallow, spoiled, whiny, and very impressed with herself. Having sex with older men, especially Humbert Humbert, seems to be her way of both asserting her individuality and affirming her own sense of self-worth.
Humbert Humbert is sympathetic in his gift for description, but that aside, a most unpleasant little man. Quilty is a pompous pervert. Several others are drips, bores, oafs, and mentally unstable.
The least likeable person in the book dies far too soon to give more than a nauseating aftertaste. Charlotte Haze is pretentious, vain, temperamental, and just plain mental. She is possibly the least mature individual in Nabokov's tale. Her sexuality, such as it is, is repulsive. She never grew up. I think that her predatory lust for Humbert Humbert represents a Lolita-like tendency in herself that was never satisfied. She is more frustrated, and has been so for far longer, than any grown-up woman should be. Consequently she is the comic relief.
Nabokov doesn't like minor characters providing amusement, so he kills her off in a dull way. Her friends and neighbors display more interest in her unbereaved widower's mental condition going forward than in her fate.
Understandable - there was nothing sad about it. It was fitting, and about time.
Infectious Asian (Stephanie 周) these posts: 1. Lolita: http://infectiousasian.blogspot.com/2009/09/lolita.html 2. Nabokov and Lolita - Nymphets in the bellfry: http://infectiousasian.blogspot.com/2009/09/nabokov-and-lolita-nymphets-in-bellfry.html 3. Charlotte Haze and her dishy daughter: http://infectiousasian.blogspot.com/2009/09/charlotte-haze-and-her-dishy-daughter.html 4. Oh no! Lolita has absconded! : http://infectiousasian.blogspot.com/2009/09/oh-no-lolita-has-absconded.html
I cannot say that the characters in the book are very attractive. Lolita is described in a way that makes clear that her delightful physique (if you are inclined towards pedophilia) is not matched by any intellectual appeal. She is shallow, spoiled, whiny, and very impressed with herself. Having sex with older men, especially Humbert Humbert, seems to be her way of both asserting her individuality and affirming her own sense of self-worth.
Humbert Humbert is sympathetic in his gift for description, but that aside, a most unpleasant little man. Quilty is a pompous pervert. Several others are drips, bores, oafs, and mentally unstable.
The least likeable person in the book dies far too soon to give more than a nauseating aftertaste. Charlotte Haze is pretentious, vain, temperamental, and just plain mental. She is possibly the least mature individual in Nabokov's tale. Her sexuality, such as it is, is repulsive. She never grew up. I think that her predatory lust for Humbert Humbert represents a Lolita-like tendency in herself that was never satisfied. She is more frustrated, and has been so for far longer, than any grown-up woman should be. Consequently she is the comic relief.
Nabokov doesn't like minor characters providing amusement, so he kills her off in a dull way. Her friends and neighbors display more interest in her unbereaved widower's mental condition going forward than in her fate.
Understandable - there was nothing sad about it. It was fitting, and about time.
Swedish liars
Recently put another piece on Pro-Israel Bay Bloggers about the Swedish Blood-Libel.
This piece:
Swedish Lies Revisited
http://proisraelbaybloggers.blogspot.com/2009/09/swedish-lies-revisited.html
The reason for the article is that I'm simply trying to avoid reading the Goldstone report, as it is dense and full of pretension. So I'm changing the subject, to one I am by now very familiar with.
I've quoted at length from Barry Rubin, whose many articles can be found here:
http://rubinreports.blogspot.com/
There's lots of good stuff there.
The most recent article (http://rubinreports.blogspot.com/2009/09/meet-palestinians-next-leader-muhammad.html) is about the professional murderer whom the Palestinians will see as their nextfuhre.. leader.
He will no doubt be described by Berkeleyites as the be-all and end-all of sweet liberal secular-humanist saints. The Europeans, of course, will also love him.
This piece:
Swedish Lies Revisited
http://proisraelbaybloggers.blogspot.com/2009/09/swedish-lies-revisited.html
The reason for the article is that I'm simply trying to avoid reading the Goldstone report, as it is dense and full of pretension. So I'm changing the subject, to one I am by now very familiar with.
I've quoted at length from Barry Rubin, whose many articles can be found here:
http://rubinreports.blogspot.com/
There's lots of good stuff there.
The most recent article (http://rubinreports.blogspot.com/2009/09/meet-palestinians-next-leader-muhammad.html) is about the professional murderer whom the Palestinians will see as their next
He will no doubt be described by Berkeleyites as the be-all and end-all of sweet liberal secular-humanist saints. The Europeans, of course, will also love him.
Sunday, September 13, 2009
Grant Patel and the investigation of Richard Becker's thingy
So once again the pervert Grant Patel has raised mister Richard Becker's penis. As a subject of conversation. Asserting, once more, that it is well known to be a very small thing.
I don't know WHY he keeps bringing it up. He's the only person who is fascinated by it. As he proved himself to be all of summer.
[Richard Becker is the queen bee of International ANSWER on the West Coast. He's against everything good and wholesome, and one MIGHT think that he is so out of frustration. But there's also a psychopathic side to his dislikes - he's anti-Semitic, a racist, a leftwing bigot, and a thoroughly repulsive piece of work. He resides in San Francisco, not far from the offices of International ANSWER on Mission Street, and just around the corner from that hotbed of hatred, the Women's Building. Grant Patel probably lives right next door to Richard Becker, possibly even having a bedroom window view of Becker's bathroom. Or overlooking the patio where revolutionaires disport en-deshabille.]
Goodness gracious, mister Patel, but you are obsessed by Richard Becker!
And his ....... tiny penis!
PROOF:
http://grantpatel.blogspot.com/2009/05/richard-becker-very-tiny-manhood-and.html
In which our notorious Parsi goes into unconfirmable details about mister Richard Becker's tiny penis, waxing obscenely lyrical: "Poor chap cursed with a very tiny lor, the use of which is wellnigh impossible without tweezers and a profound sense of humor, both of which he is lacking. His frustration mounts with each failed mounting. Noodly appendage not even spaghetti strap dimension, and utterly void of horn. Poor basterd. Sod him."
http://grantpatel.blogspot.com/2009/05/richard-becker-is-entirely-too-little.html
This post details in the anonymous third person what can only be Grant Patel's own experiences: "The multitudes of trustworthy witnesses include many and several with unprintable yet very entertaining experiences in public washrooms, and on long greyhound bus trips, or of the probing cavity searches required of traveling terror supporters, and plus the very finest physicians and religious men - all of whom are profoundly knowledgeable about baby puds and boyish winkies, smooth as a gazelle's rump, and ALL of them remark and aver that Richard Becker has a tiny tiny penis."
http://grantpatel.blogspot.com/2009/08/richard-becker-instead-of-seafood.html
Here Grant Patel goes over the top, implying that Richard Becker's penis is a shared interest: "Alack, odds bodkins, and zooks! How soon after our wholesome and cheerful disputation concerning the tiny penis of Richard Becker do you overlook me. Was the miniscule manlihood of International ANswer droodge Dick Becker the ONLY thing we had in common? You have no interest in me myself now that we argue NOT about how infinitally small and inconsequential is mister Richard Becker in his masculine appendum?"
Yes, these are your best posts, Grantikins. You have devoted much time and effort to the subject. It must fill every waking moment of yours, eh what?
The uninvolved observer might think Richard Becker's penis to be the very epitome of manliness and rigor, given the zest and energy that you have devoted to it's pursuit. Or rather, to it's description.
I, on the other hand, am fascinated not by Richard Becker's penis, of whatever dimension (or lack thereof) it may turn out to be, but by you. What possesses a man who calls himself a discriminating lawyer to devote so much energy to something so utterly unimportant?
Don't they have penises where you come from, mister Patel?
I don't know WHY he keeps bringing it up. He's the only person who is fascinated by it. As he proved himself to be all of summer.
[Richard Becker is the queen bee of International ANSWER on the West Coast. He's against everything good and wholesome, and one MIGHT think that he is so out of frustration. But there's also a psychopathic side to his dislikes - he's anti-Semitic, a racist, a leftwing bigot, and a thoroughly repulsive piece of work. He resides in San Francisco, not far from the offices of International ANSWER on Mission Street, and just around the corner from that hotbed of hatred, the Women's Building. Grant Patel probably lives right next door to Richard Becker, possibly even having a bedroom window view of Becker's bathroom. Or overlooking the patio where revolutionaires disport en-deshabille.]
Goodness gracious, mister Patel, but you are obsessed by Richard Becker!
And his ....... tiny penis!
PROOF:
http://grantpatel.blogspot.com/2009/05/richard-becker-very-tiny-manhood-and.html
In which our notorious Parsi goes into unconfirmable details about mister Richard Becker's tiny penis, waxing obscenely lyrical: "Poor chap cursed with a very tiny lor, the use of which is wellnigh impossible without tweezers and a profound sense of humor, both of which he is lacking. His frustration mounts with each failed mounting. Noodly appendage not even spaghetti strap dimension, and utterly void of horn. Poor basterd. Sod him."
http://grantpatel.blogspot.com/2009/05/richard-becker-is-entirely-too-little.html
This post details in the anonymous third person what can only be Grant Patel's own experiences: "The multitudes of trustworthy witnesses include many and several with unprintable yet very entertaining experiences in public washrooms, and on long greyhound bus trips, or of the probing cavity searches required of traveling terror supporters, and plus the very finest physicians and religious men - all of whom are profoundly knowledgeable about baby puds and boyish winkies, smooth as a gazelle's rump, and ALL of them remark and aver that Richard Becker has a tiny tiny penis."
http://grantpatel.blogspot.com/2009/08/richard-becker-instead-of-seafood.html
Here Grant Patel goes over the top, implying that Richard Becker's penis is a shared interest: "Alack, odds bodkins, and zooks! How soon after our wholesome and cheerful disputation concerning the tiny penis of Richard Becker do you overlook me. Was the miniscule manlihood of International ANswer droodge Dick Becker the ONLY thing we had in common? You have no interest in me myself now that we argue NOT about how infinitally small and inconsequential is mister Richard Becker in his masculine appendum?"
Yes, these are your best posts, Grantikins. You have devoted much time and effort to the subject. It must fill every waking moment of yours, eh what?
The uninvolved observer might think Richard Becker's penis to be the very epitome of manliness and rigor, given the zest and energy that you have devoted to it's pursuit. Or rather, to it's description.
I, on the other hand, am fascinated not by Richard Becker's penis, of whatever dimension (or lack thereof) it may turn out to be, but by you. What possesses a man who calls himself a discriminating lawyer to devote so much energy to something so utterly unimportant?
Don't they have penises where you come from, mister Patel?
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
Gaily waving my panties!
Provocative title, isn't it?
For the past three weeks or more I have been posting occassionally on PIBB (Pro-Israel Bay Bloggers), which is a forum started by Chaim ben David and Atboth.
The raison d'être of said blog is "an opportunity to vent, a useful resource, and a reference library for pro-Israel bloggers in the San Francisco Bay Area".
Here are some of my posts:
09/09/09
Saeb Erekat smoking crack
http://proisraelbaybloggers.blogspot.com/2009/09/saeb-erekat-smoking-crack.html
Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat appears to be under the influence of some hallucinatory substance. Judging by one of his recent utterances.
09/04/09
Sheikh Salam Hozeil - Righteousness is its own reward
http://proisraelbaybloggers.blogspot.com/2009/09/sheikh-salam-hozeil-rihgteousness-is.html
There are Jews and Israelis who speak on behalf of Palestinians. Why aren't there Arabs who speak on behalf of Jews and Israel?
09/03/09
Tutu wishes a pox upon you
http://proisraelbaybloggers.blogspot.com/2009/09/tutu-wishes-pox-upon-you.html
Archbishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa seems to believe that guilt is the desirable state of mind of everyone who isn't a black South African.Or the karmic cousin of a saintly black South African.
There's much more where that came from. Really. Go ahead, click this link:
http://proisraelbaybloggers.blogspot.com/
You'll be glad you did.
But but but, where are the panties?
Whence the charming title of this post, seeing as no undergarments are being actually waved?
Well, one of the two bloggers mentioned above once wrote that an eye-catching title pulls people in. And he must be right, because everytime I've mentioned panties, both Grant Patel and some amphibian have immediately commented underneath. So I thought I should use my panties constructively and thrill them to bits.
Now, please imagine that tight little bikini briefs with a print pattern of red red strawberries are being waved in your direction.
Hey guys, over here!
For the past three weeks or more I have been posting occassionally on PIBB (Pro-Israel Bay Bloggers), which is a forum started by Chaim ben David and Atboth.
The raison d'être of said blog is "an opportunity to vent, a useful resource, and a reference library for pro-Israel bloggers in the San Francisco Bay Area".
Here are some of my posts:
09/09/09
Saeb Erekat smoking crack
http://proisraelbaybloggers.blogspot.com/2009/09/saeb-erekat-smoking-crack.html
Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat appears to be under the influence of some hallucinatory substance. Judging by one of his recent utterances.
09/04/09
Sheikh Salam Hozeil - Righteousness is its own reward
http://proisraelbaybloggers.blogspot.com/2009/09/sheikh-salam-hozeil-rihgteousness-is.html
There are Jews and Israelis who speak on behalf of Palestinians. Why aren't there Arabs who speak on behalf of Jews and Israel?
09/03/09
Tutu wishes a pox upon you
http://proisraelbaybloggers.blogspot.com/2009/09/tutu-wishes-pox-upon-you.html
Archbishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa seems to believe that guilt is the desirable state of mind of everyone who isn't a black South African.Or the karmic cousin of a saintly black South African.
There's much more where that came from. Really. Go ahead, click this link:
http://proisraelbaybloggers.blogspot.com/
You'll be glad you did.
But but but, where are the panties?
Whence the charming title of this post, seeing as no undergarments are being actually waved?
Well, one of the two bloggers mentioned above once wrote that an eye-catching title pulls people in. And he must be right, because everytime I've mentioned panties, both Grant Patel and some amphibian have immediately commented underneath. So I thought I should use my panties constructively and thrill them to bits.
Now, please imagine that tight little bikini briefs with a print pattern of red red strawberries are being waved in your direction.
Hey guys, over here!
Friday, August 28, 2009
The eyes, they follow you around the room!
School started this week and already I'm exhausted. As I get older I realize that I have less in common with others, despite superficial similarities, and of course appearances. Heck, the appearances are perhaps the least noticeable things, because so many of us look alike.
And ninety nine point oomph percent of us wear glasses. It is our most prominent facial feature. Some of us pop out of the womb already wearing them (labor takes a bit longer in that case).
There's something at once comforting and threatening, disturbing, about seeing an entire class filled with featureless glinting eyes, that all look in the same direction. Windows on little pan faces.
0-0
No wonder half of the teachers are nuts.
And ninety nine point oomph percent of us wear glasses. It is our most prominent facial feature. Some of us pop out of the womb already wearing them (labor takes a bit longer in that case).
There's something at once comforting and threatening, disturbing, about seeing an entire class filled with featureless glinting eyes, that all look in the same direction. Windows on little pan faces.
0-0.....0-0.....0-0.....0-0.....0-0.....0-0.....0-0.....0-0.....0-0
0-0.....0-0....0-0.....0-0.....0-0.....0-0.....0-0
0-0.....0-0.....0-0.....0-0.....0-0
0-0.....0-0.....0-00-0
No wonder half of the teachers are nuts.
Thursday, August 27, 2009
Bloodlibels and Swedish self-righteousness
When a newspaper publishes scurrilous calumnies about African Americans, Chinese (or Pacific Islander) Americans, Latinos, or even any other invented hyphenation of American that feels entitled to grievance, most decent people are outraged, and will gladly support the demand for some kind of redress.
When a newspaper deliberately publishes falsehoods that seek to rile up hatred and violent discrimination, perhaps the matter is so egregious that they must be condemned by all honest politicians?
Surely the government should speak out against the promotion of racial hatred and bigotry, if only to show that such matters are not tolerated in civilized society?
NOT IN SWEDEN - BIGOTRY IS ENCOURAGED!
This is probably because righteous blond übermenshen cannot conceive of the possibility that anything they do might be objectionable. And in any case, the only ones complaining are "those people". You know, "those people" - îck îck pøø!
A vigorous Scandinavian dislike of Jews is a Germanic virtue.
Quote:
"As documented in the Jerusalem Post, Boström freely admits that he has no evidence whatsoever to back up this blood libel, but indicated that it is up to Israelis to prove innocence in this matter. "
End quote.
SOURCE: http://www.bluetruth.net/2009/08/tell-swedish-government-to-condemn.html
Quote:
"This is not an isolated incident, but part of an insidious pattern of Swedish funding of anti-Semitism. As the Post article also noted, "Much of the material in Boström's article came from a book he published in 2001 Inshallah which was jointly financed by the Swedish Foreign Ministry and various other government-backed organizations."
End quote.
In other words, the Swedish Government is directly involved in promoting lies about, and hatred of, Israel.
[But evenmore! Swedish state agency subsidizes Gothenburg terror conference - revealing Swedish government funding for a symposium seeking to 'remove the PFLP, Hamas and other terrorist organizations from the EU’s terror list', in order that the organizations in question could resume collecting funds legally in Europe. Also on the agenda were a total boycott of Israel and 'developing strategies to explain the need for armed resistance' (terrorism)]
However, Swedish duplicity is well known.
Quote:
"NGO Monitor issued a comprehensive report in June 2009 detailing the history of Swedish official support for NGO's that demonize Israel with the inflammatory rhetoric of "apartheid," "ethnic cleansing," and "massacres.""
End quote.
The quotes above are on BLUE TRUTH, in this post, which you should read in its entirety.
The article's author, Dr. Mike, urges you to let the Swedish government know that this does not sit well with decent people.
A list of Swedish diplomatic offices can be found here , and the Swedish Consulate in San Francisco can be found here.
Their e-mail address is sf@consulateofsweden.org
I am sure they would just about love to hear from you.
When a newspaper deliberately publishes falsehoods that seek to rile up hatred and violent discrimination, perhaps the matter is so egregious that they must be condemned by all honest politicians?
Surely the government should speak out against the promotion of racial hatred and bigotry, if only to show that such matters are not tolerated in civilized society?
NOT IN SWEDEN - BIGOTRY IS ENCOURAGED!
This is probably because righteous blond übermenshen cannot conceive of the possibility that anything they do might be objectionable. And in any case, the only ones complaining are "those people". You know, "those people" - îck îck pøø!
A vigorous Scandinavian dislike of Jews is a Germanic virtue.
Quote:
"As documented in the Jerusalem Post, Boström freely admits that he has no evidence whatsoever to back up this blood libel, but indicated that it is up to Israelis to prove innocence in this matter. "
End quote.
SOURCE: http://www.bluetruth.net/2009/08/tell-swedish-government-to-condemn.html
Quote:
"This is not an isolated incident, but part of an insidious pattern of Swedish funding of anti-Semitism. As the Post article also noted, "Much of the material in Boström's article came from a book he published in 2001 Inshallah which was jointly financed by the Swedish Foreign Ministry and various other government-backed organizations."
End quote.
In other words, the Swedish Government is directly involved in promoting lies about, and hatred of, Israel.
[But evenmore! Swedish state agency subsidizes Gothenburg terror conference - revealing Swedish government funding for a symposium seeking to 'remove the PFLP, Hamas and other terrorist organizations from the EU’s terror list', in order that the organizations in question could resume collecting funds legally in Europe. Also on the agenda were a total boycott of Israel and 'developing strategies to explain the need for armed resistance' (terrorism)]
However, Swedish duplicity is well known.
Quote:
"NGO Monitor issued a comprehensive report in June 2009 detailing the history of Swedish official support for NGO's that demonize Israel with the inflammatory rhetoric of "apartheid," "ethnic cleansing," and "massacres.""
End quote.
The quotes above are on BLUE TRUTH, in this post, which you should read in its entirety.
The article's author, Dr. Mike, urges you to let the Swedish government know that this does not sit well with decent people.
A list of Swedish diplomatic offices can be found here , and the Swedish Consulate in San Francisco can be found here.
Their e-mail address is sf@consulateofsweden.org
I am sure they would just about love to hear from you.
Monday, August 24, 2009
Limbaugh is a moron
I really wonder what goes on in the narrow hickville lives of the great white interior. Do these people have any intellectual stimulation in their trailer parks? Is there anything at all that will make them think? Or is that ability entirely atrophied?
Why do they listen to Rush Limbaugh? They stooopid???!!!?!
Limbaugh compared President Obama to Adolf Hitler.
"Adolf Hitler, like Barack Obama, also ruled by dictate";
"(Obama)is sending out his brownshirts to head up opposition to genuine American citizens who want no part of what Barack Obama stands for and is trying to stuff down our throats";
"Obama is asking citizens to rat each other out like Hitler did".
Those opinions (and they hardly even qualify as opinions, being rather evidence of a lack of thinking), reflect a fundamentalist Christian, glow-in-the-dark conservative, ethnophobic, view of America.
A view that resonates among Rush Limbaugh's fellow Republicans.
Who are falling over each other to get into bed him.
Rudy Giuliani: "He's a very valuable and important voice."
Mitt Romney: "I listen to him."
John McCain: "A voice of a significant portion of our conservative movement in America".
Why do they listen to Rush Limbaugh? They stooopid???!!!?!
Limbaugh compared President Obama to Adolf Hitler.
"Adolf Hitler, like Barack Obama, also ruled by dictate";
"(Obama)is sending out his brownshirts to head up opposition to genuine American citizens who want no part of what Barack Obama stands for and is trying to stuff down our throats";
"Obama is asking citizens to rat each other out like Hitler did".
Those opinions (and they hardly even qualify as opinions, being rather evidence of a lack of thinking), reflect a fundamentalist Christian, glow-in-the-dark conservative, ethnophobic, view of America.
A view that resonates among Rush Limbaugh's fellow Republicans.
Who are falling over each other to get into bed him.
Rudy Giuliani: "He's a very valuable and important voice."
Mitt Romney: "I listen to him."
John McCain: "A voice of a significant portion of our conservative movement in America".
Morons and poltroons, hacks and rank opportunists.
All contenders for the 2012 nomination, of course.
Colin Powell has been probably the only Republican with the stomes to reject Limbaughism. Which will no doubt ruin his reputation among the rant and file.
Rush Limbaugh represents racialism, bigotry, and extremist rhetoric towards everyone who is not white, not Republican, and not Christian.
Drivers of pickup trucks and other vehix commonly on cement blocks in front of the house seem to love him.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
