Grant Patel and the investigation of Richard Becker's thingy

So once again the pervert Grant Patel has raised mister Richard Becker's penis. As a subject of conversation. Asserting, once more, that it is well known to be a very small thing.

I don't know WHY he keeps bringing it up. He's the only person who is fascinated by it. As he proved himself to be all of summer.

[Richard Becker is the queen bee of International ANSWER on the West Coast. He's against everything good and wholesome, and one MIGHT think that he is so out of frustration. But there's also a psychopathic side to his dislikes - he's anti-Semitic, a racist, a leftwing bigot, and a thoroughly repulsive piece of work. He resides in San Francisco, not far from the offices of International ANSWER on Mission Street, and just around the corner from that hotbed of hatred, the Women's Building. Grant Patel probably lives right next door to Richard Becker, possibly even having a bedroom window view of Becker's bathroom. Or overlooking the patio where revolutionaires disport en-deshabille.]


Goodness gracious, mister Patel, but you are obsessed by Richard Becker!

And his ....... tiny penis!


PROOF:

http://grantpatel.blogspot.com/2009/05/richard-becker-very-tiny-manhood-and.html
In which our notorious Parsi goes into unconfirmable details about mister Richard Becker's tiny penis, waxing obscenely lyrical: "Poor chap cursed with a very tiny lor, the use of which is wellnigh impossible without tweezers and a profound sense of humor, both of which he is lacking. His frustration mounts with each failed mounting. Noodly appendage not even spaghetti strap dimension, and utterly void of horn. Poor basterd. Sod him."


http://grantpatel.blogspot.com/2009/05/richard-becker-is-entirely-too-little.html
This post details in the anonymous third person what can only be Grant Patel's own experiences: "The multitudes of trustworthy witnesses include many and several with unprintable yet very entertaining experiences in public washrooms, and on long greyhound bus trips, or of the probing cavity searches required of traveling terror supporters, and plus the very finest physicians and religious men - all of whom are profoundly knowledgeable about baby puds and boyish winkies, smooth as a gazelle's rump, and ALL of them remark and aver that Richard Becker has a tiny tiny penis."


http://grantpatel.blogspot.com/2009/08/richard-becker-instead-of-seafood.html
Here Grant Patel goes over the top, implying that Richard Becker's penis is a shared interest: "Alack, odds bodkins, and zooks! How soon after our wholesome and cheerful disputation concerning the tiny penis of Richard Becker do you overlook me. Was the miniscule manlihood of International ANswer droodge Dick Becker the ONLY thing we had in common? You have no interest in me myself now that we argue NOT about how infinitally small and inconsequential is mister Richard Becker in his masculine appendum?"


Yes, these are your best posts, Grantikins. You have devoted much time and effort to the subject. It must fill every waking moment of yours, eh what?
The uninvolved observer might think Richard Becker's penis to be the very epitome of manliness and rigor, given the zest and energy that you have devoted to it's pursuit. Or rather, to it's description.

I, on the other hand, am fascinated not by Richard Becker's penis, of whatever dimension (or lack thereof) it may turn out to be, but by you. What possesses a man who calls himself a discriminating lawyer to devote so much energy to something so utterly unimportant?

Don't they have penises where you come from, mister Patel?